NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bakovski v Lenehan (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 739 Hearing dates: On written submissions Decision date: 02 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hall J Decision: (1) Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiffs against the first and second defendants in the sum of $444,772.92. (2) The first and second defendants are to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings as against the first and second defendants, such costs to be assessed: (a) On the ordinary basis in respect of the period up to and including 21 February 2013; and (b) On the indemnity basis in respect of the period from 22 February 2013 to the date of judgment. Catchwords: COSTS - Calderbank offer - defendants unreasonably refused plaintiffs' offer - costs awarded on an indemnity basis from the date of offer Cases Cited: Bakovski v Lenehan [2014] NSWSC 671 Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298 Jones v Trad (No 3) [2013] NSWCA 463 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 SMEC Testing Services Pty Limited v Campbelltown City Council [2000] NSWCA 323 Category: Costs Parties: George Bakovski (First Plaintiff) Vera Bakovski (Second Plaintiff) Norman Rutherford Lenehan t/as Lenehan & Co (First Defendant) James Socrates Arkoudis (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Finnane (Plaintiffs) G Curtin SC (Defendants) Solicitors: Uther Webster & Evans (Plaintiffs) Gilchrist Connell (Defendants) File Number(s): 2010/269931
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate