Chao Joi Foong v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 183

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chao Joi Foong v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] NSWCA 183 Hearing dates: 26 May 2014 Decision date: 26 May 2014 Before: McColl JA Decision: Notice of motion dismissed with costs [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PROCEDURE - application for stay - application made on the basis of hardship - no proper basis for stay demonstrated - no question of principle Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Limited v Winfield [1992] 2 Qd R 282 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Chao Joi Foog - first applicant Yena Suzen Foong - second applicant Commonwealth Bank of Australia -respondent Representation: Counsel: Applicants: Ms Yena Suzen Foong (self-represented) Respondent: Ms Van Ravels Solicitors: Applicants: self-represented Respondent: Gadens Lawyers File Number(s): CA 2014/144319 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Citation: Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Foong (Supreme Court (NSW), Beech-Jones J, 4 April 2014 (unrep)) Date of Decision: 2014-04-04 00:00:00 Before: Beech-Jones J File Number(s): SC 2012/238493