NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Suzanne Margaret Lawrence v Australian War Memorial [2014] NSWSC 757 Hearing dates: 3 March 2014 Decision date: 10 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Young AJA Decision: Probate of 2009 Will granted. Costs of all parties to the proceedings to be paid out of the deceased estate. Catchwords: SUCCESSION - deceased's duly executed last will was lost - whether lost will should be treated as destroyed and revoked - whether deceased therefore died intestate - whether probate of final will should be granted on terms identical to those recorded in the carbon copy of the will found amongst the deceased's possessions - doctrine of dependant relative revocation - whether doctrine has been excluded by Succession Act 2006 s 8(2) and s 15(1) - whether revocation of earlier duly executed will was conditional on replacement by a later operative will - whether earlier will can revived under the doctrine. Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 8(2)(c), s10 (3)(c), s 15(1) Cases Cited: Adams v Southerden [1925] P 177 Allan v Morrison [1900] AC 604 Matter of Estate of Ausley 818 P.2d 1226 Baird v Huang; Estate of Robin Sydney Williams [2001] NSWSC 409 Cahill v Rhodes [2002] NSWSC 561 Cassie v Koumans [2007] NSWSC 481 Curley v Duff [1985) 2 NSWLR 716 In re Jones (Deceased) [1976] Ch 200 Re Ralston, Supreme Court of NSW, 12 September 1996, unreported Sheen v Sheen [2005] 6 WWR 627 Sugden v Lord St Leonards (1876) LR 1 PD 154 Tracey v Edwards (2000) 49 NSWLR 739 Texts Cited: FC Hutley, Dependant Relative Revocation and mistake" (1948) 22 ALJ 259 G L Certoma, "The Law of Succession in New South Wales" 4th ed 2010 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Suzanne Margaret Lawrence (plaintiff) Australian War Memorial (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Ellison (plaintiffs) Mr Stretton (third defendants) Solicitors: Bartier Perry (plaintiffs) Hunter Flood (third defendants) File Number(s): 2012/255756 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate