NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Demlakian Engineers Pty Ltd v The Owners of Strata Plan 80453 [2014] NSWSC 759 Hearing dates: 25 March 2014; 26 March 2014 Decision date: 10 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Young AJA Decision: Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of proceedings 2011/00310085 up to and including 1 February 2012. Plaintiffs to pay the defendant's costs of those proceedings, on the indemnity basis on and after 2 February 2012. Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of proceedings 2012/379744 on the indemnity basis. The judgment sum in 2011/00310085, security for costs paid by plaintiff, and costs due to the plaintiff in those proceedings to be set-off against the costs ordered against the plaintiff in proceedings 2011/00310085 and 2012/379744. Leave to apply for orders to recover any shortfall in costs owing to the defendant from plaintiff's principal solicitors granted. Catchwords: COSTS - plaintiff brought two proceedings which were heard concurrently - plaintiff brought first claim in Local Court - these proceedings were removed to the Supreme Court to be heard alongside second proceedings which alleged breach of copyright - proceedings considered separately for the purpose of costs - plaintiff succeeded in the first proceedings - whether defendant entitled to costs on the indemnity basis from the date of defendant's first offer of compromise where the offer did not specifically mention compromise of the defendant's cross-claim, was said to be 'unclear' by plaintiff, and arose prior to the commencement of the second proceedings - the second proceedings were dismissed - whether defendant entitled to costs on the indemnity basis where plaintiff said to have brought 'hopeless' claim in order to put defendant under pressure to settle first proceedings. Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act (NSW) s 348 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98, 98(1)(b) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 42.15 Category: Costs Parties: Demlakian Engineers Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) The Owners (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A. Di Francesco (Plaintiff) A. M. Gruzman (Defendant) Solicitors: Konstan Lawyers (Plaintiff) Di Lizo & Associates (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/310085; 2012/00379744 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate