Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RHG Mortgage Corporation Limited v Polino (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 765 Hearing dates: In chambers Decision date: 10 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: The sum of $39,249 paid into Court by the plaintiff be paid to Mrs Polino. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - order seeking payment of sum paid into court to defendant - order made Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: RHG Mortgage Corporation Limited (Plaintiff) Joanne Polino (Defendant) Representation: Solicitors: Mrs J Polino, unrepresented (Defendant) File Number(s): 2014/126400 Publication restriction: None Judgment 1On 23 May 2014, I dealt with a motion filed by Mrs Joanne Polino, seeking payment to her of a sum of $39,249 paid into Court by the plaintiff (see RHG Mortgage Corporation Limited v Polino [2014] NSWSC 699). 2The only other person with an apparent interest in that sum was her former husband, Mr Roland Polino. On 23 May, I indicated that orders would be made that the sum be paid to Mrs Polino, if Mr Polino did not take steps before 6 June to have the proceedings relisted, in order to pursue any claim to payment of the sum to him, which he wished to advance. 3Mr Polino has taken no steps to pursue payment of the sum to him, either before the proceedings were commenced, or afterwards. He has not appeared in the proceedings to oppose the order sought by Mrs Polino, despite service upon him of the plaintiff's application, Mrs Polino's motion, her discussions with him deposed to in her supporting affidavit and the text messages annexed to that affidavit, and the orders made on 23 May. 4On 30 May, Mrs Polino filed an affidavit evidencing service on Mr Polino of the orders made on 23 May. He having taken no steps to pursue any claim for payment of the sum paid into Court and not entering an appearance to oppose the orders which Mrs Polino sought, I am satisfied that, as foreshadowed in the judgment given on 23 May, I should now order that: The sum of $39,249 paid into Court by the plaintiff be paid to Mrs Polino. ********** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 24 September 2014