NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: McKittrick v R [2014] NSWCCA 128 Hearing dates: 2 April 2014 Decision date: 16 July 2014 Before: Simpson J at [1] Davies J at [48] Adamson J at [147] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal; 2. Allow the appeal in part; 3. Quash the sentence imposed by Maiden DCJ in respect of sequence 4; 4. In lieu thereof, in respect of that offence, the Applicant be sentenced to imprisonment made up of a non-parole period of 1 year, commencing on 27 May 2015 and expiring on 26 May 2016, with a balance of term of 2 years and 6 months, expiring on 26 November 2018. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - obtain financial advantage by deception - multiple counts - two Ponzi schemes at different times in different locations - second scheme operated while applicant on bail from charges relating to first scheme - amounts involved exceeding $13 million - losses exceeding $1 million - delay in charging for second scheme - whether taken into account on sentence - totality principle - sentencing by different judges for each scheme - whether second judge had regard to totality of offending and sentence imposed by first judge - accumulation and effect on statutory ratio - variation to non-parole period Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Sentencing Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: AB v R [2014] NSWCCA 31 Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Baghdadi v R [2012] NSWCCA 212 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 John Michael Higgins v R [2006] NSWCCA 38 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Blanco [1999] NSWCCA 121; 106 A Crim R 303 R v Boulden [2006] NSWSC 1274 R v Cameron [2005] NSWCCA 357 R v Kelly [2006] NSWSC 1142 R v MAK (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 R v V (1998) 99 A Crim R 297 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Assembly Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 10 May 1989 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patricia Lillian McKittrick (Applicant) Crown Representation: Counsel: A Miller (Applicant) N Noman SC (Crown) Solicitors: Bell Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2011/415324 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-07-25 00:00:00 Before: Maiden DCJ File Number(s): 2011/415324
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate