NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dominic Iacullo and Lillian Iacullo v Luigi Iacullo & Ors [2014] NSWSC 787 Hearing dates: 10, 11 and 15 April 2014 Decision date: 13 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Black J Decision: Judgment that trial to proceed on basis of specified paragraphs of proposed further amended cross-claim not challenged or where leave has been granted, and for cross-claimants not to be allowed a further opportunity to amend the cross-claim. Parties to be heard as to time for filing of proposed cross-claim and directions in respect of pleadings. No order as to costs, save as to usual order that cross-claimants pay costs thrown away by proposed amendments. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - application for leave to file further amended cross-claim - strike-out application in respect of amended cross-claim - where leave was previously refused to file amended cross-claim in previous form - where leave was granted for amendments to be made to cross-claim - whether pleadings state with sufficient clarity the case that must be met - whether pleadings have a tendency to cause embarrassment in the proceedings - whether pleadings facilitate the just, quick and cheap resolution of real issues in proceedings. Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 56(1), 58(1), 58(2), 59 - Civil Procedure Act 2010 (VIC) s 24 - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 125, 126 - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 14.28, 15.3, 15.4 Cases Cited: - Addenbrooke v Duncan (No 2) [2013] FCA 820 - ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Intagro Projects Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 1054 - Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 - Commissioner of Taxation v Bargwanna [2012] HCA 11; (2012) 244 CLR 655 - Expense Reduction Analyst Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Managing and Marketing Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 46 - Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89 - Fortescue Metals Group Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 39; (2012) 247 CLR 486 - Gunns Ltd v Marr [2005] VSC 251 - Hillig v Darkinjung Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 683 - McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 - Northam v Favelle Favco Holdings Pty Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Bryson J, 7 March 1995, unrep) - Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd [2012] HCA 16; (2012) 248 CLR 42 - Shelton v National Roads & Motorists Assn Ltd [2004] FCA 1393; (2004) 51 ACSR 27 - Yara Australia Pty Ltd v Oswal [2013] VSCA 337 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Dominic Iacullo (Second Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Lillian Iacullo (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Luigi Iacullo (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Badminton Investments Pty Ltd (Second Cross-Defendant) IMS Developments Pty Ltd (Third Cross-Defendant) Homeline Construction Pty Ltd (Fourth Cross-Defendant) Michael Murr (Fifth Cross-Defendant) Pacificon Pty Ltd (Sixth Cross-Defendant) MMAI Pty Ltd (Seventh Cross-Defendant) Glad Con Pty Ltd (Eighth Cross-Defendant) Homeline Building Pty Limited (Proposed Ninth Cross-Defendant) Representation: D A Smallbone (Defendants/First and Second Cross-Claimants) L Iacullo (in person) (Plaintiff/First and Second Cross-Defendants) F G Lever SC (Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Cross-Defendants) J T Svehla (Proposed Ninth Cross-Defendant) Allsop Glover (Defendants/Cross-Claimants) L Iacullo (in person) (Plaintiffs/First and Second Cross-Defendants) Carroll & O'Dea (Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Cross-Defendants) Rowan Solicitors (Proposed Ninth Cross-Defendant) File Number(s): 07/257623
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate