NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Templar v Britton (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 802 Hearing dates: 11 June 2014 Decision date: 11 June 2014 Before: McCallum J Decision: Plaintiff to pay the costs of the three applications identified in this judgment together with the costs of the argument today. The application to have those costs orders payable forthwith is refused. Plaintiff to provide a fifth further amended statement of claim addressing the matters raised in Hicksons Lawyers' letter dated 22 May 2014 within 14 days. Catchwords: DEFAMATION - Costs - whether the court should order that costs be payable by the plaintiff forthwith Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Barach v UNSW [2013] NSWSC 10 Fiduciary v Morning Star Research [2002] NSWSC 432 Hamod & Anor v State of New South Wales & Anor [2007] NSWSC 707 Templar v Britton [2013] NSWSC 1827 Templar v Britton [2014] NSWSC 187 Templar v Britton (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 587 Category: Costs Parties: Stephen Templar (plaintiff) Audametrics Pty Ltd (second plaintiff) Paul Britton (first defendant) Bradley Laughlan (second defendant) State of New South Wales (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Rasmussen (plaintiffs) D Sibtain (defendants) Solicitors: City Attorneys (plaintiffs) Hicksons Lawyers (defendants) File Number(s): 2012/393936 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate