NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Latham v Hubbard; Estate of Ross [2014] NSWSC 805 Hearing dates: 21 May 2014 Decision date: 19 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: White J Decision: Refer to para [43] of judgment. Catchwords: COSTS - consent order for payment of costs on a trustee basis - directions as to meaning and effect of order Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Legal Profession Reform Act 1993 Legal Profession Act 1987 Legal Profession Act 2004 Cases Cited: Harvey v Phillips (1956) 95 CLR 235 Re National Safety Council of Australia, Victorian Division (in liquidation) (No. 2) [1992] 1 VR 485 Johnson v Krishnan [2008] NSWSC 665 Agusta Pty Ltd & Ors as trustees for the Cavallino Unit Trust v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2008] NSWSC 685 Re Martin v Jacobs [2008] NSWSC 1378 The Owners Strata Plan No. 36131 v Dimitriou [2009] NSWCA 7; 74 NSWLR 370 Chang v Tijong [2009] NSWSC 122 Simpson v Trust Company Fiduciary Services Limited [2009] NSWSC 912 Re Cuesuper Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 981 Johnson v Krishnan [2009] NSWSC 1284 Colantuono v Colantuono [2009] NSWSC 1445 Application of NSFT Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 380 Fay v Moramba Services Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 725 Re Perpetual Investment Management Limited as responsible entity for Perpetual's monthly income fund and Perpetual's wholesale monthly income fund [2011] NSWSC 615 Zhang v Middleton; Estate of Cook [2011] NSWSC 881 Myles v Myles [2011] NSWSC 1184 Loblay v Loblay [2013] NSWSC 1195 Re Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1681 Agusta Pty Ltd v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy as trustee of estates of Gustavo Ferella and Angelo Ferella [2009] NSWCA 129 Phillips v Walsh (1990) 20 NSWLR 206 Texts Cited: Dal Pont, Law of Costs, 3rd ed, LexisNexis Butterworths Hansard, 9 November 1993, 3rd series, Vol 238 Category: Costs Parties: Stuart John Latham (Plaintiff/Applicant) Joel Hubbard (Defendant) Richard Watson (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M B Evans (Plaintiff/Applicant) T S Hale SC (Defendant) C Birch SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Lathams Lawyers (Plaintiff) Diamond Conway (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/284489
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate