NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Walsh v Walgett Shire Council [2014] NSWSC 812 Hearing dates: 03/06/2014, 4/06/2014, 05/06/2014, 06/06/2014,10/06/2014, 11/06/2014 Decision date: 11 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McDougall J Decision: Tender rejected Catchwords: EVIDENCE - documentary evidence - statutory provisions relating to business records - whether document of WorkCover a 'business record' - whether representations in document are made in connection with an investigation - whether investigation must in fact lead to proceedings for exception to apply - application of s 69(3)(b) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) EVIDENCE - admissibility - whether discretionary reasons for refusing to admit evidence - where evidence in the form of answers to specific questions - where witness not called - application of s 135 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Occupational Health & Safety Act 2000 (NSW) Work Health & Safety Act 2011 (NSW) Cases Cited: Lewincamp v ACP Magazines Ltd [2008] ATCSC 69 Rickard Constructions v Rickard Hails Moretti [2004] NSWSC 984 Vitali v Stachnik [2001] NSWSC 303 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Daniel Peter Walsh (Plaintiff) Walgett Shire Council (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: DR Campbell SC / IJ McGillicuddy (Plaintiff) JE Sexton SC / G Donnellan (Defendant) Solicitors: Beston Macken McManis (Plaintiff) Mills Oakley Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/380694
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate