NSW Caselaw
Local Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ACN 142 134 076 Pty Ltd v Dimension Data Australis Pty Ltd & Maya [2013] NSWLC 30 Hearing dates: 23/05/2013, 16/09/2013 Decision date: 05 November 2013 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Magistrate Bradd Decision: Verdict for the first and second defendants Catchwords: CONTRACTS - agency - whether the second defendant had ostensible authority - meaning of the term 'account manager'- whether the second defendant breached a warranty of authority - whether the plaintiff relied on the representation of the second defendant Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Australian Blue Metal Limited v Hughes & Ors (1961) 79 WN (NSW) 498 Freeman and Lockyer (a firm) v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) and Another [1964] 1 All ER 630 Northside Developments Pty Ltd v Registrar-General (1990) 170 CLR 146 Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451 Penn v Bristol & West Building Society & Ors [1997] 1 WLR 1356 Yonge v Toynbee [1910] 1 KB 215 Texts Cited: Bowstead W and Reynolds F.M.B., "Bowstead & Reynolds on Agency", 16th ed. (1996), Sweet & Maxwell Category: Principal judgment Parties: ACN 142 134 076 Pty Limited (formerly Virtual Learning Technologies Pty Ltd) (plaintiff) Dimension Data Australis Pty Ltd (first defendant) Terry Maya (second defendant) Representation: P Macarounas for the plaintiff D Pritchard SC for the defendants J Castrission for the plaintiff A Connolly for the defendants File Number(s): 2012/221724
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate