NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Poole (No2) [2014] NSWCATOD 67 Decision date: 20 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: O Shub (Principal member) Dr R Hochstadt (Dentist member) Dr A Lang (Dentist member) Dr C Berglund PhD (Lay member) Decision: The Tribunal orders that the Respondent be de-registered and that he not be entitled to apply for re-registration for at least 12 months. The Tribunal orders the Respondent to pay the costs of the Complainant Catchwords: Dentist - Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct, Professional misconduct, failed implants, crowns, bridges, failure to respond to complaint in reasonable time, order to repay fees, conditions placed on registration, breach of conditions. Legislation Cited: Dental Practice Act 2001 Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) (the National Law) Cases Cited: Childs v Walton NSW Court of Appeal. Unreported 13 November 1990; Buttsworth v Walton. NSW Court of Appeal. Unreported 19 December 1991; Law Society of New South Wales v Bannister (1993) 4 LPDR 24; Council of Law Society of New South Wales v Foreman (1994) 34 NSWLR 408; HCCC v Litchfield (1997) 41 NSWLR 630 and Law Society of New South Wales v Walsh NSW Court of Appeal. Unreported 15 December 1997; Law Society of New South Wales v Bannister and Ex parte Tziniolis Re Medical Practitioners Act; Health Care Complaints Commission v Dr Perroux (No. 2) [2011] NSWMT 15; Barratt v Medical Board of Australia [2012] NSWMT 22. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Complainant) Dr Stephen Poole (Respondent) Representation: Counsel P Griffin, (Complainant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Complainant) No appearance (Respondent) File Number(s): 1420011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate