NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Walker v Siasat [2014] NSWLEC 86 Hearing dates: 18 June 2014 Decision date: 26 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: 1. Each party is to pay its own costs of these proceedings. 2. Costs of the hearing on costs on 18 June 2014 are reserved. 3. Exhibits may be returned. Catchwords: COSTS - dismissed judicial review proceedings challenging grant of development consent - whether discontinuing applicant successful party sufficient to justify costs in his favour - whether respondents acted unreasonably - whether local council should have filed submitting appearance Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 96, s 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 42.19, r 42.20, Pt 59 Cases Cited: Capital Airport Group Pty Ltd v Director-General of the NSW Department of Planning (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 83 Cutcliffe v Lithgow City Council [2006] NSWLEC 463; (2006) 147 LGERA 330 Glaser v Poole (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 232 Kiama Council v Grant [2006] NSWLEC 96; (2006) 143 LGERA 441 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72 Ralph Lauren 57 Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2014] NSWCA 107; (2014) 199 LGERA 424 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; (1997) 186 CLR 622 Category: Costs Parties: Walker, Stephen (Applicant) Siasat, Frederick Joseph (First Respondent) Siasat, Tennielle (Second Respondent) Kiama Municipal Council (Third Respondent) Representation: Mr I Hemmings SC with Mr S Nash (Applicant) Mr R White (First and Second Respondents) Mr M Seymour (Third Respondent) McPhee Kelshaw (Applicant) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (First and Second Respondents) RMB Lawyers (Third Respondent) File Number(s): 40225 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate