NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cornerstone Danks Street v Parkview Constructions [2014] NSWSC 866 Hearing dates: 19/06/2014 Decision date: 19 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Technology and Construction List Before: McDougall J Decision: Declare adjudicator's determination void. Grant ancillary injunctive relief. First defendant to pay plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION - Adjudication determinations - application for declaration that adjudicator's determination is void - whether adjudicator failed to comply with statutory obligation imposed by s 21(3) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act 1999 (NSW) - whether determination void where as at the date by which determination was to be made not all matters in dispute had been decided
PROCEDURE - costs - whether to grant indemnity costs where argument of contestable point of law and no relevant delinquency Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cornerstone Danks Street Pty Limited as Trustee for the Cornerstone Danks Street Unit Trust (First Plaintiff) Cornerstone Danks Street No1 Pty Limited (Second Plaintiff) Parkview Constructions Pty Limited (First Defendant) Adjudicate Today Pty Limited (Second Defendant) Max Tonkin (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J B Simpkins SC / J A Wright (Plaintiff) M Christie SC / ARR Vincent (First Defendant) Solicitors: Colin Biggers & Paisley (Plaintiffs) Salim Rutherford Lawyers (First Defendant) Moray & Agnew (Second and Third Defendants) File Number(s): 2014/172448
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate