NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Holschier [2014] NSWSC 867 Hearing dates: 23, 27 June 2014 Decision date: 27 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adams J Decision: 1. Pursuant to section 15(4) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 ("the Act") -
(a) that Dr Katie Seidler and Dr Richard Furst be appointed to conduct separate examinations of the defendant and to furnish reports to the Supreme Court of New South Wales on the results of those examinations by 22 August 2014; and
(b) the defendant is directed to attend those examinations.
2. Pursuant to section 10B of the Act, that the defendant be subject to an interim supervision order in accordance with the conditions specified in the Schedule attached to these orders, signed by me and dated today, from the date on which he is released from lawful custody (including by an order of the State Parole Authority), for a period of 28 days.
3. The matter be listed on 25 July 2014 for the plaintiff to apply for a further interim supervision order referred to in order 2.
4. The plaintiff file and serve any evidence on which it relies by 29 August 2014.
5. The defendant file and serve any evidence on which he relies by 12 September 2014.
6. The plaintiff file and serve submissions on which it relies by 17 September 2014.
7. The defendant file and serve submissions on which he relies by 22 September 2014.
8. Any submissions of the plaintiff in reply to be filed and served by 24 September 2014.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate