NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Eberstaller v Poulos [2014] NSWCA 211 Hearing dates: 26 June 2014 Decision date: 26 June 2014 Before: Beazley P; Meagher JA; Leeming JA Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: COURTS - jurisdiction - proceedings in Supreme Court to enforce settlement of matrimonial cause embodied in consent orders of Family Court - whether appeal lay to Court of Appeal - first duty of courts to determine jurisdiction - nature of proceeding to enforce settlement of dispute arising under federal law - proceeding was a matter arising under Family Law Act - prohibition on commencing appeal other than in Full Court of Family Court in Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) applied - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Constitution, covering cl 5, ss 75 and 76 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 37A Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss 4, 117 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth), ss 4, 5, 7 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Cases Cited: Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 Bramco Electronics Pty Ltd v ATF Mining Electrics Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 392 Bruton Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2009] HCA 32; 239 CLR 346 CSL Australia Pty Ltd v Formosa [2009] NSWCA 363; 261 ALR 441 Edwards v Santos Ltd [2011] HCA 8; 242 CLR 421 Felton v Mulligan (1971) 124 CLR 357 Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 Grace v Grace [2014] NSWCA 86 Khatri v Price [1999] FCA 1289; 95 FCR 287 Lewis v Hall [2005] FCAFC 251 LNC Industries Ltd v BMW (Australia) Ltd (1983) 151 CLR 575 Macteldir Pty Ltd v Dimovski [2005] FCA 1528; 226 ALR 773 Poulos v Eberstaller (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 235 Poulos v Eberstaller [2013] NSWSC 1509 Poulos v Eberstaller [2013] NSWSC 1849 Stack v Coast Securities (No 9) Pty Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 261 WFA v Hobart City Council [2000] NSWCA 43 Young v Lalic [2006] NSWSC 18; 197 FLR 27 Zhang v Zemin [2010] NSWCA 36; 79 NSWLR 513 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hans Richard Eberstaller (Appellant) Lisa Ann Polous (First Respondent) Premjit Singh (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A J L Ogborne (Appellant) M Einfeld QC with K Tang (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate