NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Aquaqueen International Pty Ltd v Titan National Pty Ltd [2014] NSWDC 79 Hearing dates: 28 May 2014 Decision date: 30 May 2014 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson Decision: (1) Summons dismissed. (2) Plaintiffs pay defendants' costs. (3) Liberty to apply in relation to costs. Catchwords: COSTS - Appeal pursuant to s 384 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) - successful party's earlier application for indemnity costs on the basis of the manner of conduct of the proceedings refused - successful party later obtained indemnity costs order following refusal of its offer of compromise - whether trial judge's indemnity costs order correctly interpreted by Costs Review Panel - whether successful party was obliged under rr 42.2 and 42.7 UCPR to require the trial judge to set aside the earlier orders refusing indemnity costs - whether trial judge's judgment on costs (not provided to the Costs Review Panel) was inadmissible as fresh evidence - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 384 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 26.20, 36.4, 36.11, 36.15, 36.16, 42.2, 42.7, 42.15A and 50.16 Cases Cited: Bellevarde Constructions Pty Ltd v CPC Energy Pty Ltd (2011) 12 DCLR (NSW) 304 Frumar v Owners of Strata Plan 36957 [2010] NSWCA 172 Gorczynski v AWM Dickinson & Son [2005] NSWSC 277 Guttershield Systems Australia Pty Ltd v LBI Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 1409 Hammond v Hammond (No 2) [2010] NSWSC 377 Johnson v Madden t/as Maddens Solicitors [2000] NSWSC 463 Kable v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 361 McCausland v Surfing Hardware International Holdings Pty Ltd (2010) 11 DCLR (NSW) 294 Wentworth v Rogers (2006) 66 NSWLR 474 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 227 Texts Cited: - Category: Principal judgment Parties: First Plaintiff: Aquaqueen International Pty Limited (ACN 094 129 389) Second Plaintiff: Shirley Penson First Defendant: Titan National Pty Limited (ACN 092 896 029) Second Defendant: Kathryn Wood-Weber Third Defendant: Stephen John Lancken Fourth Defendant: Rosemary Workman Representation: Plaintiffs: Ms M Castle Defendants: Mr M L Brabazon SC Plaintiffs: (Direct Access) Defendants: Pure Legal File Number(s): 2014/17976 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate