NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Newsom v Adventure World Travel Pty Ltd [2013] NSWDC 318 Hearing dates: 20 June 2013 Decision date: 27 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff for $153,822.25. (2) Defendant pay plaintiff's costs. (3) Liberty to apply in relation to interest and costs. (4) Exhibits retained for 28 days. Catchwords: CONTRACT - construction of termination clause in employment contract - notice of termination given by employee - whether employer able to give a later notice so as to shorten the effective notice period - whether contractual right of either party to terminate by notice is exhausted once exercised by one or other party - whether exercise of right to fix period of notice above stipulated minimum period constrained by implied obligations of reasonableness and good faith Legislation Cited: - Cases Cited: Australian Wool Selling Brokers Employers' Federation v Federated Storemen and Pakers Union (1976) 176 CAR 884 Birrell v Australian National Airlines Commission (1984) 5 FCR 447 Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker [2013] FCAFC 83 Current Images Pty Ltd v Dupack Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 99 Currie v Glen (1936) 54 CLR 445 Ramsey v Annesley College [2013] SASC 72 Rawson v Hobbs (1961) 107 CLR 466 Re Fyfe, Dickinson v Dickinson [1946] ALR 344 Russell v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church [2008] 72 NSWLR 559 Shepherd v Felt & Textiles of Australia Ltd (1935) 41 CLR 359 Snaith v Parkinson [1899] 1 Ch 642, C.A. University of Western Australia v Gray (2009) FCR 346 Walker v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Limited [2006] FCAFC 101 Yorkshire Water Services Ltd v Sun Alliance & London Insurance PLC [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep 21 Texts Cited: Words and Phrases Legally Defined, 2nd ed. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Peter Bowden Newsom Defendant: Adventure World Travel Pty Ltd (ACN 122 505 631) Representation: Plaintiff: Mr I D Faulkner SC / Ms L Chan Defendant: Mr S Rushton SC / Mr J Darams Plaintiff: Stevens & Associates Lawyers Defendant: Clayton Utz File Number(s): 2012/386639 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate