NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zraika v Walsh [2014] NSWSC 892 Hearing dates: 23 June 2014 Decision date: 23 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: Admit the Statement of Mr Bernard into Evidence Catchwords: EVIDENCE - admissibility - hearsay evidence - exceptions - maker available - where maker no longer has recollection of event but has provided an earlier statement EVIDENCE - admissibility - judicial discretion to exclude or limit the use of evidence - application to exclude evidence where prejudice outweighs probative value Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 64 Cases Cited: Graham v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Sharif Zraika by his tutor Hamila Zraika (plaintiff); Rebecca Jane Walsh (first defendant); Joseph Bernard Walsh (second defendant); Roads & Maritime Services (third defendant); Bankstown City Council (fourth defendant); Ali Zraika (fifth defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Higgs SC with T Boyd (plaintiff); K P Rewell SC (First and second defendant); M Fordham SC with H Chiu (third defendant); R S Sheldon SC with P M Knowles (fourth defendant); G Smith (fifth defendant) Solicitors: Kheir Lawyers (plaintiff); McInnes Wilson Lawyers (first, second and fifth defendants) Hicksons Lawyers (third defendant); Mills Oakley, Lawyers (fourth defendant); File Number(s): 2011/52630
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate