NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dunks v R [2014] NSWCCA 134 Hearing dates: 13 May 2014 Decision date: 18 July 2014 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Campbell J at [55] Decision: Appeal against conviction dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - text message used to re-establish credit was a prior consistent statement - judge did not err in not specifically adverting to s 192 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) - unmeritorious "armchair" appeal Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Darwiche v R; El-Zeyat v R; Aouad v R; Osman v R [2011] NSWCCA 62 Graham v The Queen [1998] HCA 61; 195 CLR 606 Poniris v R [2014] NSWCCA 100 R v Esho; R v Sako [2001] NSWCCA 415 R v RTB [2002] NSWCCA 104 R v Reardon [2002] NSWCCA 203; 186 FLR 1 R v Selsby [2004] NSWCCA 381 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ronnie Paul Dunks (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Miralis (Solicitor for appellant) Ms T Smith (Crown) Solicitors: Nyman Gibson Stewart Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2011/382693 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-01-24 00:00:00 Before: Acting Judge Freeman File Number(s): 2011/382693
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate