NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Peterson (No. 2) [2014] NSWSC 966 Hearing dates: 21 July 2014 Decision date: 22 July 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Campbell J Decision: The language of s 19 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 does not create a statutory bar to the continuation of this special hearing beyond the anniversary of the making of the finding of unfitness of Bellew J. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW -special hearings -statutory interpretation -whether s 19 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 creates limitation period within which special hearing must be conducted. Legislation Cited: Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 Cases Cited: Kesavarajah v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 230 Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1937) 59 CLR 369 R v Mailes [2001] NSWCCA 155; 53 NSWLR 251 R v Peterson [2013] NSWSC 1002 R v Presser [1958] VR 45 R v Wilson (No. 1) [2013] NSWSC 1146; R v Wilson (No. 2) [2013] NSWSC 1288 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Queen (Crown) John Francis Peterson (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C. Maxwell QC (Crown) C. Smith (Offender) Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Legal Aid NSW (Offender) File Number(s): 2012/173835
Judgment 1This matter is before the Court for a special hearing pursuant to the provisions of ss 19, 21 and 21A Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (the Act).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate