NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Eastbrook Pastoral Pty Ltd v Muswellbrook Shire Council [2014] NSWLEC 1144 Hearing dates: 3 & 4 July 2014. Agreed conditions filed 15 July 2014 Decision date: 22 July 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal upheld Catchwords: Development application: subdivision, whether minimum allotment provisions of LEP apply to community title subdivision, adequacy of water and sewerage services, density, character, visual impacts, earthworks, traffic, impact on road network. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979; Muswellbrook Local Environmental Plan 2009; State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development) 2008; Standard Instrument (Local Environmental Plans) Order 2006; Standard Instrument-Principal Local Environmental Plan Cases Cited: Codlea Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [1999] NSWCA 399 Texts Cited: Muswellbrook Shire Development Control Plan 2009; Muswellbrook Residential and Rural Residential Strategy - Final Report; Walk and Cycle Plan for Muswellbrook and Denman; Building Code of Australia Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eastbrook Pastoral Pty Limited (Applicant)
Muswellbrook Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr M Staunton (Applicant) Mr J Cole HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr A Seton Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s): 10087 of 2014
Judgment 1Eastbrook Pastoral Pty Ltd lodged development application No 98/2013 seeking consent to re-subdivide States 16-18 of the existing Eastbrook Links Estate in two stages, state one being a two lot subdivision to create a development lot and a residue and stage two, a community title subdivision of the development lot into 167 community title lots of which one is to be a community lot and the remaining 166 lots, development lots for future dwelling construction. Muswellbrook Council refused consent and Eastbrook is appealing that decision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate