NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Scott Edward REGAN [2014] NSWDC 118 Hearing dates: 12/6/14 to 16/6/14 Decision date: 16 June 2014 Before: Judge A Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Exclusion of all evidence obtained as a result of unlawful forensic procedure: verdicts of not guilty. Catchwords: Voir dire - forensic procedure, buccal swab, exclusion of evidence resulting from illegality, judge alone. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900. Crimes (Forensic Procedure) Act 2000 Evidence Act 1995 Law Enforcement (Power and Responsibilities) Act 2002 Cases Cited: Chief Constable Royal Ulster Constabulary [1997] AC 286 Fawcett v Nimmo & Anor (2005) 156 A Crim R 431 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 Hardy v Pinazza, SCNSW, unreported, 18.4.2005 Hyder v Commonwealth [2012] NSWCA 336 R v Karger (2002) 83 SASR 135 Kerr v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWSC 637. LK v The Commissioner of Police [2011] NSWSC 458. Maguire v Beaton (2005) 162 A Crim R 21 Orban v Bayliss [2004] NSWSC 428. Walker v Bugden (2005) 155 A Crim R 416 Williams v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278 Wood v Christopherson [2013] NSWDC 233. Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Crown Scott Edward Regan (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr C Bailey (Crown- Director Public Prosecutions NSW) Mr S Bouveng (for the Accused) Solicitors: Ms C Summerfield (Instructing Solicitor - Director Public Prosecutions NSW) Mr J Horsburgh (Instructing Solicitor, Bird Legal, Bathurst NSW - for the accused) File Number(s): 2013/6424
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate