NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 26) [2014] NSWSC 1009 Hearing dates: 28 July 2014 Decision date: 31 July 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: 1. I set aside all previous costs orders made in the proceedings. 2. Judgment for the Defendant against the Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Plaintiffs for $7,770,869.00. Catchwords: COSTS - specified gross sum costs order - lengthy and complicated proceedings - Plaintiffs obtain amounts less than offered by Defendant - numerous interlocutory costs orders - Plaintiffs unrepresented - cost and delay of costs assessment process - Defendant's costs far outweigh verdicts in favour of Plaintiffs - gross sum ordered - set-off of judgments in favour of Plaintiffs and cost judgment in favour of Defendant. DAMAGES - interest - offers by Defendant more favourable than Plaintiffs recover - whether interest payable beyond offers by Defendant - s 100(4) Civil Procedure Act. Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Beverage Distributors v Evans & Tate Premium Wines Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 560 Chaina v The Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust and Others (No. 3) [2009] NSWSC 1243 Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 25) [2014] NSWSC 518 Corbett v Nguyen (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 673 Hamod v New South Wales (No 13) [2009] NSWSC 756 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison & Anor v Schipp [2002] NSWCA 213; (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Tim Barr Pty Ltd v Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1106 Young v Hones (No. 3) [2014] NSWSC 499 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (No. 2) [2014] NSWCA 99 Category: Costs Parties: George Chaina (Second Plaintiff) Rita Chaina (Third Plaintiff) Proton Technology Pty Ltd (Fourth Plaintiff) Deluxe Technology Pty Ltd (Fifth Plaintiff) The Presbyterian Church (New South Wales) Property Trust (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Rita Chaina (Plaintiffs) R Stitt QC, G L Turner & H Stitt (Defendant) Solicitors: In person (Plaintiffs) Curwoods Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2002/69354
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate