NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Burke v Burke [2014] NSWSC 1015 Hearing dates: 21 July 2014 Decision date: 25 July 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Rein J Decision: Summons dismissed. Catchwords: EQUITY - Succession - claim for family provision order under Succession Act s 59 - Where applicant is an adult child of deceased - Where applicants are eligible persons - Where deceased did not make provision for applicant in will - Whether adequate provision made for proper maintenance, education and advancement in life of applicants - Considerations under Succession Act s 60(2) - Estrangement Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Andrew v Andrew [2012] NSWCA 308 Dodds v Dodds [2013] NSWSC 1933 Dolman v Parker [2005] NSWCA 361 Ford v Simes [2009] NSWCA 351 Goldberg v Landerer [2010] NSWSC 1431 In the Estate of the late Anthony Marras [2014] NSWSC 915 Keep v Bourke [2012] NSWCA 64 Raiola v Raiola [2014] NSWSC 967 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Terence John Burke (Plaintiff) Alan Michael Burke (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Wilson SC (Plaintiff) L Ellison SC (Defendant) Solicitors: Armstrong Legal (Plaintiff) Swaab Attorneys (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/184983
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate