NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Curtis v Charles Darwin University [2014] NSWSC 1032 Hearing dates: 4 April 2014 Decision date: 31 July 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) An extension of time to appeal is granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. (3) The appellant is to pay the costs of the respondent. Catchwords: APPEAL - civil - appeal from decision of Local Court pursuant to s 39 or s 40 of the Local Court Act 2007 (NSW) - whether extension of time to appeal should be granted - whether Magistrate should have recused himself - whether appellant afforded procedural fairness at hearing - whether appellant should be permitted to re-agitate findings of fact APPEAL - EVIDENCE - civil - whether evidence improperly admitted APPEAL - CONTRACT - whether contractual relationship exists between University and student - what constitutes consideration Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 69, 166, 167 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), ss 39, 40 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 rr 36.15, 50.3 Cases Cited: Biotechnology Australia Pty Ltd v Pace (1988) 15 NSWLR 130 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Curtis v Charles Darwin University [2013] NSWSC 1558 Da Costa v The Queen [1968] HCA 51, (1968) 118 CLR 186 Dillon v Boland; Dillon v Cush [2012] NSWCA 364 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd [1915] AC 847 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; 201 CLR 488 Pico Holdings Inc v Wave Vistas Pty Ltd (formerly Turf Club Australia Pty Ltd) and Another [2005] HCA 13; 79 ALJR 825 RL & D Investments Pty Ltd v Bisby [2002] NSWSC 1082 Subramaniam v DPP [1956] 1 WLR 965 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 369 US Manufacturing Co Pty Ltd v ABB Service Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 705 X v University of Western Sydney [2014] NSWSC 82 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Phillip Curtis (Appellant) Charles Darwin University (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Appellant (self-represented) J Sleight (Respondent) Solicitors: Thomas Cooper Lawyers Pty Ltd (Respondent) File Number(s): 13/286853
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate