NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Vo v R [2014] NSWCCA 146 Hearing dates: 08/07/2014 Decision date: 08 August 2014 Before: Emmett JA at [1]; Price J at [2]; Fullerton J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - supply large commercial quantity of heroin - whether sentencing judge allowed sufficient discount for guilty plea Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193B(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(2) Cases Cited: Cameron v The Queen [2002] HCA 6; 209 CLR 339 Morton v R [2014] NSWCCA 8 R v AB [2011] NSWCCA 229 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; 195 A Crim R 1 R v Sharma [2002] NSWCCA 142; 54 NSWLR 300; 130 A Crim R 238 R v Stambolis [2006] NSWCCA 56; 160 A Crim R 510 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383; 115 A Crim R 104 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Huu Thanh Vo (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: B Brassil (Applicant) P Ingram SC (Crown) Greenfield Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2010/357431 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-05-09 00:00:00 Before: Williams J File Number(s): 2010/357431
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate