NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Scott-Irving v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1040 Hearing dates: 28 July 2014, 29 July 2014 Decision date: 31 July 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: (1) That these proceedings be dismissed on the ground that on the evidence given a judgment for the plaintiff could not be supported. I make that order under r 29.9 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW). (2) Order that the plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: TORTS - malicious prosecution - wrongful arrest and false imprisonment - claim wholly unsupported by evidence adduced by plaintiff - dismissal appropriate Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61M Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW), s 99 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 29.9 Cases Cited: A v State of New South Wales [2007] HCA 10; 230 CLR 500 Beckett v State of New South Wales [2013] HCA 17; 248 CLR 432 Davis v Gell [1924] HCA 56; (1924) 35 CLR 275 Dunlop v Woollahra Municipal Council [1982] AC 158 George v Rockett [1990] HCA 26; 170 CLR 104 Onassis v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyds Rep 403 Richardson v The Queen [1974] HCA 19; (1974) 131 CLR 116 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stewart Scott-Irving (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Hutchings (Defendant) Solicitors: Mr Scott-Irving (Unrepresented) Henry Davis York (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/19001 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate