NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Serrafis v Hong [2014] NSWDC 121 Hearing dates: 18/07/2014 Decision date: 01 August 2014 Before: Curtis J Decision: Catchwords: District Court - Notice of Motion seeking jurisdictional issue be tried separately and that the Statement of Claim be struck out - Orders in Family Court res judicata - Issue Estoppel Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 Family Law Act 1975 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: In the marriage of Kennon (1997) 22 Fam LR 1 Blair v Curran [1939] 62 CLR 464 Macquarie Bank Ltd v National Mutual life Association of Australia (1990) 40 NSWLR 543 Personal Representitives of Tang Man Sit v Capacious Investments [1996] AC 514 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR Do Carmo v Ford Excavations Pty Ltd [1983-1984] 154 CLR 234 Drayton Coal Pty Ltd v Drain [1995] NSWCA 131 Dedousis v Water Board [1994] 181 CLR 171 Baker-Morrison V New South Wales (2009) NSWLR 454; [2009] NSWCA 35 Texts Cited: Res Judicata, 4th Edition 2009 Spencer Bower and Handley Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Retina Serrafis (Plaintiff) Lindsay Hong (Defendant) Representation: D W Elliott appeared for the Plaintiff R Macaulay apperaed for the Defendant City Lawyers and Consultants (Plaintiff) Pryor Tzannes & Wallis (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/237176
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate