NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stanton v Fell (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 1052 Hearing dates: 7 November 2013 Decision date: 05 August 2014 Before: Simpson J Decision: The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs on an indemnity basis. Catchwords: COSTS - defamation - Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), s 40 - verdict for defendant - plaintiff to pay defendant's costs - order sought that costs be paid on an indemnity basis - whether plaintiff unreasonably failed to accept settlement offer made by the defendant - whether interests of justice require otherwise than an order that costs be paid on an indemnity basis - defendant showed more than the plaintiff merely failing in proceedings - Haddon v Forsyth (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 693 - plaintiff's failure to accept first and second offers was unreasonable - interests of justice require that defendant be fully indemnified - plaintiff to pay defendant's costs on an indemnity basis Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Haddon v Forsyth (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 693 Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority [2005] VSCA 298; 13 VR 435 Stanton v Fell [2013] NSWSC 1001 Category: Costs Parties: Arthur Peter Stanton (Plaintiff) Gary Fell (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S T Chrysanthou (Plaintiff) P J Hayes (Defendant) Solicitors: Access Law Group (Plaintiff) Russell Kennedy, Melbourne (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/288471
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate