NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Mereb; R v Younan [2014] NSWCCA 149 Hearing dates: 21.07.2014 Decision date: 06 August 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] McCallum J at [44] Garling J at [45] Decision: Crown appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against sentence - offences of conspiring with intention of dishonestly causing a loss to Commonwealth contrary to s135.4(3) Criminal Code (Cth) - clients of an accounting firm known as Owen T Daniel & Co - participation in illegal scheme organised by accountants to avoid payments of tax - tax shortfall approximately $1 million - whether sentence of imprisonment for 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years manifestly inadequate - sentence not "unreasonable or plainly unjust" - exercise of residual discretion in Crown appeal - appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - s16A(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s6(3) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 Bugmy v The Queen [1990] HCA 18;169 CLR 525 Bui v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2012] HCA 1; 244 CLR 638 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; 249 CLR 600 R v Boughen and Cameron [2012] NSWCCA 17 R v Hili; R v Jones [2010] NSWCCA 108 R v Lamella [2014] NSWCCA 122 R v Hawkins [2013] NSWCCA 208 R v Liles [2012] NSWSC 1249 R v Sakovitis [2013] NSWSC 464 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 R v Zerafa [2013] NSWCCA 222 Ruha v R [2010] 198 A Crim R 430 Wong v R [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 585 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commonwealth Regina - Appellant Paul Boutros Mereb - Respondent Youssef Saadallah Younan - Respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr GA Farmer SC - Appellant Crown Mr R Strickland SC - Respondents Solicitors: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Appellant Crown DCE Lawyers Pty Ltd - Respondents File Number(s): 2008/161229 2009/232614 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2014-02-07 00:00:00 Before: Sweeney DCJ File Number(s): 2008/161229 2009/232614
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate