NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Peterson (No. 4) [2014] NSWSC 1056 Hearing dates: 21- 25, 28 July 2014 Decision date: 06 August 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Campbell J Decision: The accused is not guilty of murder. On the limited evidence available, the accused committed the offence of manslaughter of Rafik Makaradi on 30 May 2012. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - special hearing - murder - manslaughter - substantial impairment - whether accused would have been guilty of murder or manslaughter in a normal criminal trial Legislation Cited: Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Potts v R [2012] NSWCCA 229 R v Peterson [2013] NSW 1002; R v Peterson (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 966 Travel Compensation Fund v Tambree (t/as R Tambree and Associates) [2005] HCA 69; (2005) 224 CLR 627 Subramaniam v The Queen (2004) 79 ALJR 116 Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Queen (Crown) John Francis Peterson (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C Maxwell QC (Crown) C Smith (Accused) Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Legal Aid NSW (Accused) File Number(s): 2012/173835
Judgment 1These reasons are my determination of the question of whether the accused murdered Rafik Makaradi sometime between 6 pm on 30th May 2012 and 6 am 31st May 2012 at Lethbridge Park, or, in the alternative, committed the offence of manslaughter.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate