NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Matthews v R [2014] NSWCCA 151 Hearing dates: 26/06/2014 Decision date: 08 August 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Rothman J at [102] Beech-Jones J at [110] Decision: Leave to appeal is granted. Appeal allowed and applicant's conviction for the offence of murder is quashed. A verdict of acquittal be entered in favour of applicant on the charge of murder. There should be a new trial on the charge of manslaughter. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - whether verdict of jury unreasonable and cannot be supported by evidence - charge of murder - two men involved in a street fight - conflicting evidence as to what happened - evidence of principal Crown witness unreliable in a number of significant respects - not open to jury to conclude beyond reasonable doubt that applicant had intent necessary for murder - murder conviction should be quashed - new trial on the charge of manslaughter. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Griffiths v R [2014] NSWCCA 60 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 R v Nguyen [2010] HCA 38; (2010) 242 CLR 491 R v Rasic [2009] NSWCCA 202 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adam James Matthews - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr J Stratton SC - Applicant Mr P Ingram SC - Respondent Crown Solicitors: Watsons Solicitors - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2011/60340 Decision under appeal Citation: Regina v Matthews [2013] NSWSC 659 Date of Decision: 2013-04-16 00:00:00 Before: Mathews J File Number(s): 2011/60340
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate