NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Reeves [2014] NSWCCA 154 Hearing dates: 23 May 2014 Decision date: 18 August 2014 Before: Bathurst CJ; Hall J; R A Hulme J Decision: (1) Crown appeal against sentence allowed. (2) Sentences imposed by the District Court on 1 July 2011 be set aside. (3) The respondent is re-sentenced as follows: (i) In respect of the offence of dishonestly obtain benefit by deception contrary to s 178BA of the Crimes Act, the respondent is sentenced to a term of imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 1 year 3 months commencing on 1 June 2011 and to expire on 31 August 2012 with a parole period of 6 months to expire on 28 February 2013. (ii) In respect of the offence of aggravated indecent assault of CA contrary to s 61M(1) of the Crimes Act, the respondent is sentenced to a term of imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 1 year 2 months commencing on 1 June 2012 and to expire on 31 July 2013 and a parole period of 4 months to expire on 30 November 2013. (iii) In respect of the offence of maliciously inflict grievous bodily harm with intent contrary to s 33 of the Crimes Act, the respondent is sentenced to a term of imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 1 year commencing on 1 June 2013 and expiring on 31 May 2014 with a parole period of 2 years to expire on 31 May 2016. (4) The Court notes that the non-parole period in respect of the sentence in (iii) above expired on 31 May 2014. Accordingly, the respondent is to remain on parole. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against sentence - further hearing of appeal on remittal from the High Court of Australia - sentence imposed at first instance was manifestly inadequate - exercise of the residual discretion pursuant to s 5D of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - consideration of factors relevant to the exercise of the residual discretion - respondent's deteriorating health since sentencing - the effect of re-sentencing on the respondent's rehabilitation - expiration of the non-parole period imposed at first instance - delay in hearing of the appeal - time spent in quasi custody - respondent re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Brown v R [2013] NSWCCA 44 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 Director of Public Prosecutions v Karazisis [2010] VSCA 350; 31 VR 634 Green v R; Quinn v R [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 R v Anderson [2012] NSWCCA 175 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; 195 A Crim R 1 R v Deng [2007] NSWCCA 216; 176 A Crim R 1 R v DKL [2013] NSWCCA 233 R v Hansel [2004] NSWCCA 436 R v Hernando [2002] NSWCCA 489; 136 A Crim R 451 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49; 77 NSWLR 7 R v Todorovic [2008] NSWCCA 49 R v Tortell [2007] NSWCCA 313 R v Yang [2002] NSWCCA 464; 135 A Crim R 237 Reeves v R; R v Reeves [2013] NSWCCA 34 Reeves v The Queen [2013] HCA 57; 88 ALJR 215 Renshaw v R [2012] NSWCCA 91 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Graeme Stephen Reeves (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Ingram SC (Crown) G Bashir; S Beckett (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Legal Aid Commission (Respondent) File Number(s): 2008/77882 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2011-07-01 00:00:00 Before: Woods QC DCJ File Number(s): 2008/77882
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate