NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: TU v R [2014] NSWCCA 155 Hearing dates: 28 July 2014 Decision date: 15 August 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Beech-Jones J at [2] Hamill J at [71] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted. (2) The appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - child sexual assault - victim offender's daughter - offences seven years apart - whether sentencing judge erred in finding offence not isolated - alleged use of wrong statistics - Ellis discount - alleged failure to consider rehabilitation and remorse - error demonstrated - no lesser sentence warranted in law. Legislation Cited: - Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61N, s 66A, s 578A - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A, s 44, s 54A, s 54D, Pt 3 Div 3 - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: - Beldon v R [2012] NSWCCA 194 - Elyard v R [2006] NSWCCA 43 - Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 - R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 - R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 - Ryan v R [2001] HCA 21; 206 CLR 267 Category: Principal judgment Parties: "TU" (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A. Barrie (Applicant) L. Babb SC (Respondent) Solicitors: George Sten & Co (Applicant) S. Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/053844 Publication restriction: See [*2*] Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-10-25 00:00:00 Before: Blackmore DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate