NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Booth [2014] NSWCCA 156 Decision date: 13 August 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Beech-Jones J at [2]; Hamill J at [3]. Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Quash the sentences imposed in the District Court. (3) In lieu thereof, the respondent is sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 7½ years commencing on 18 December 2012 and expiring on 17 June 2020. There will be a non-parole period of 3½ years commencing on 18 December 2012 and expiring on 17 June 2016. (4) The respondent will become eligible for release to parole at the expiration of the non-parole period. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - prosecution appeal - manifest inadequacy - failure to accumulate - circumstances of deprivation - intellectual disability - institutionalised offender - relevance of deterrence - whether sentencing Judge failed to consider deterrence - deterrence of limited relevance - sentencing of Aboriginal offenders - residual discretion - moderate increase in degree of accumulation Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Brown v R [2012] NSWCCA 199 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Hili and Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 450 Johnson v the Queen [2004] HCA 15; 205 ALR 346; 78 ALJR 616 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; 294 CLR 600 Neal v The Queen (1982) 149 CLR 305 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 at [46] R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Engert (1994) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 R v Gladue [1999] 1 SCR 688 R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540; 118 A Crim R 66 R v Harris [2007] NSWCCA 130 R v Henry and ors [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Ipeelee [2012] 1 SCR 433 R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 R v Nykolyn [2012] NSWCCA 219 R v Tsiaras [1996] 1 VR 398 SHR v R [2014] NSWCCA 94 Trad v R [2009] NSWCCA 56; 194 A Crim R 20 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown (Appellant) Daniel Booth (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Ingram SC (Appellant) B Rigg (Respondent) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Appellant) Legal Aid New South Wales (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/45396 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-12-18 00:00:00 Before: Judge Toner
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate