NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Reid v Wright [2014] NSWSC 1110 Hearing dates: 14 August 2014 Decision date: 15 August 2014 Before: McCallum J Decision: Application to have proceedings transferred to the Supreme Court of Queensland refused Catchwords: PROCEDURE - cross-vesting - proceedings commenced in Supreme Court of New South Wales - application for transfer to Supreme Court of Queensland - interests of justice Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) Civil Liability Act 2002 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Bankinvest AG v Seabrook (1988) 14 NSWLR 711 BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz [2004] HCA 61; (2004) 221 CLR 400 Dow Jones v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56; (2002) 210 CLR 575 John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503 Reid v Wright [2014] NSWSC 795 Reid v Wright [2014] NSWSC 904 Reid v Wright [2014] NSWSC 929 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Christine Reid (plaintiff) Diane Marie Wright t/as DM Wright & Associates Solicitors (defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Sheller (plaintiff) G Curtin SC (defendant) Solicitors: Greg Walsh & Co Solicitors (plaintiff) DLA Piper Australia (defendant) File Number(s): 2013/002346 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate