NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Milling v Hardie (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 285 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 25 August 2014 Before: Beazley P Macfarlan JA Sackville AJA Decision: Order that the respondents pay the appellant's costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - costs - no issue of principle Cases Cited: Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 2) [2014] HCA 31 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Kenneth Milling (Appellant) David Hardie (First Respondent) Tracey Hardie (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G M McGrath (Appellant) B W Rayment QC/M A Bradford (Respondents) Solicitors: Hannaford Cox Connellan & McFarland (Appellant) Booth Brown Samuels & Olney (Respondents) File Number(s): CA 2013/140710 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111 Citation: Hardie v Milling [2013] NSWSC 310 Date of Decision: 2013-04-10 00:00:00 Before: Lindsay J File Number(s): SC 2010/00420515
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate