NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lindsay-Owen v Schofields Property Development Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1177 Hearing dates: 11 to 14 August 2014 Decision date: 28 August 2014 Before: Ball J Decision: 1. The plaintiffs' claim and the defendant's cross-claim be dismissed. 2. The plaintiffs pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CONTRACT - construction of joint venture agreement - whether pre-existing bank debt to be paid by plaintiffs with own funds or by joint venture with funds borrowed for proposed development - extrinsic materials - whether permissible to rely on pre-contractual negotiations in aid of construction or to establish intention of parties - whether permissible to rely on post-contractual conduct as admission to prove a fact relevant to parties' contractual obligations - where no admission identified - where post-contractual conduct relied on to establish intention of parties CONTRACT - relief - whether mutual mistake to support order for rectification - where no common intention of the parties PROCEDURE - civil - pleadings - application to amend case to include claim for rectification for unilateral mistake - where proposed amendment deficient - where amendment sought on final day of hearing - where witnesses would need to be recalled if amendment allowed Cases Cited: Agricultural & Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner [2008] HCA 57; (2008) 238 CLR 570 Arthur Yates & Company Pty Ltd v Vegetable Seeds Committee [1945] HCA 55; (1945) 72 CLR 37 Australian Gypsum Ltd v Hume Steel Ltd [1930] HCA 38; (1930) 45 CLR 54 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales [1982] HCA 24; (1982) 149 CLR 337 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd [2014] HCA 7; (2014) 306 ALR 25 Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407; (2009) 76 NSWLR 603 Igloo Homes Pty Ltd v Sammut Constructions Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 280 Johns v Australian Securities Commission (No 2) (1992) 35 FCR 146 Johnston v Brightstars Holding Company Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 150 Maralinga Pty Ltd v Major Enterprises Pty Ltd [1973] HCA 23; (1973) 128 CLR 336 NSW Medical Defence Union Ltd V Transport Industries Insurance Co Ltd (1986) 6 NSWLR 740 Ryledar Pty Ltd v Euphoric Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 65; (2007) 69 NSWLR 603 Texts Cited: RP Meagher, JD Heydon and MJ Leeming, Meagher Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, (4th ed, 2001, LexisNexis) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gregory Hamilton Willoughby Lindsay-Owen (First Plaintiff) DairyCorp Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Schofields Property Development Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Dicker SC with D Hand (Plaintiffs) L V Gyles SC with S Lawrance (Defendant) Solicitors: Mills Oakley Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Clayton Utz (Defendant) File Number(s): 2014/157612 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate