NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zeng v Mossensons [2014] NSWSC 1179 Hearing dates: 11/08/2014, 12/08/2014, 13/08/2014, 14/08/2014, 15/08/2014, 18/08/2014, 19/08/2014, 20/08/2014 and 21/08/2014 Decision date: 21 August 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: McDougall J Decision: See at [178] to [186], [188] Catchwords: TRUSTS - express trust - whether balance of moneys held on trust for purposes set out in a deed should be repaid where deed terminated - whether entitled to terminate deed where breaches of trust - whether breaches constituted repudiation of agreement - whether payments were made in breach of trust - whether payments made contrary to terms permitted in deed - whether party who directed payment from trust in breach of deed also liable - whether trustee entitled to contribution or indemnity by party who procured breaches of trust CONTRACTS - whether amounts paid for purposes which have failed - whether there is a resulting trust where purposes have failed - whether total failure of consideration - whether entitled to have account of profits where no evidence that money applied towards the purposes for which it was paid - whether this should be at plaintiffs' risk as to costs PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to amend pleadings - whether to grant leave to amend pleadings after hearing already commenced - where amendment would have required recasting of the evidence - where new pleadings inconsistent with admissions made in existing pleadings DEEDS - parties to deeds - whether a person who signed a deed as a director of another party, is also a party to that deed and bound by that deed - where person named as a party to the deed but did not execute deed in own right as a party Legislation Cited: Corporations Act (2001) (Cth) Cases Cited: Hasler v Singtel Optus [2014] NSWCA 266 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Zeng Zhao Qin (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant in First Cross-Claim) Shandong Tianye Mining Co Limited (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant in First Cross-Claim) Shandong Tianye Group Pty Limited (Third Plaintiff/Third Cross-Defendant in First Cross-Claim) Mossensons Pty Ltd (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant in Second Cross-Claim) Ian Mossenson (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant in Second Cross-Claim) Shandong Tianye Australia Limited (Third Defendant/First Cross-Claimant to First Cross-Claim/First Cross-Defendant in Second Cross-Claim) Gabriel Ehrenfeld (Fourth Defendant/ Second Cross-Claimant to First Cross-Claim/Second Cross-Defendant in Second Cross-Claim) Tilapia Pty Ltd (Fifth Defendant/ Third Cross-Defendant in Second Cross-Claim) (De-registered) Fundamental Capital Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant/ Fourth Cross-Defendant in Second Cross-Claim) Steinbruck Management Services Pty Ltd (Seventh Defendant/ Third Cross-Claimant to First Cross-Claim/Fifth Cross-Defendant in Second Cross-Claim) (De-registered) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Fourth Cross-Defendant in First Cross-Claim) Li Qun (Fifth Cross-Defendant in First Cross-Claim) Hu Zhigang (Sixth Cross-Defendant in First Cross-Claim) Representation: Counsel: P Jammy (Plaintiffs) B McManus (First and Second Defendants) G Ehrenfeld (Fourth Defendant in person) Third, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Defendants not represented at hearing Solicitors: HWL Ebsworth (Plaintiffs) Kennedys (First and Second Defendants) G Ehrenfeld (Fourth Defendant in person) File Number(s): 2012/203913
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate