NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Reznitsky v State of New South Wales [2014] NSWDC 143 Hearing dates: 1 August 2014 Decision date: 29 August 2014 Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendant. (2) Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs. (3) Exhibits retained for 28 days. Catchwords: COSTS - costs appeal under s 384 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) - plaintiff appeals from party/party costs assessment - whether costs assessor denied the plaintiff procedural fairness by handing down a determination after the plaintiff failed to comply with a timetable for submissions - previous history of failure by plaintiff to comply with timetables for submissions - no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), ss 359, 384 and 385 Cases Cited: Arnott v Glissan [2013] NSWCA 316 B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2008) 74 NSWLR 481 Bellevarde Constructions Pty Ltd v CPC Energy Pty Ltd (2011) 12 DCLR (NSW) 304 Gorczynski v AWM Dickinson & Son [2005] NSWSC 277 Lang v Back & Schwartz [2009] NSWDC 180 Lang v Kirkness (New South Wales Supreme Court, Harrison M, 22 October 1997) Texts Cited: Legal Profession Reform Bill, 1993 Second Reading Speech (Hansard, 16 September 1993, p. 3227) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Boris Reznitsky Defendant: State of New South Wales Representation: Plaintiff: In person Defendant: Mr G Bateman Plaintiff: In person Defendant: Crown Solicitor's Office (NSW) File Number(s): 2013/367957
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate