NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Parfett v Roads and Maritime Services [2014] NSWLEC 1182 Hearing dates: 11 and 12 February and 19 June 2014 Decision date: 05 September 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Miller AC Decision: See para 73 Catchwords: Acquisition of highly productive rural land under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991, highest and best use of land, special value, s 57, claim for anticipated capital growth in land value not allowed Legislation Cited: Roads Act 1993 Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Blayney Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Beckers v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW [2006] NSWLEC 717 at [45] Boland v Yates Property Corp Pty Ltd [1999] 74 ALJR 209 at [269] Commissioner of Succession Duties (South Australia) and Executor Trustee and Agency Company of South Australia Limited and others [1947] 74 CLR 358 at 373 George D Angus Pty Ltd v Health Administration Corporation [2013] NSWLEC 212 Mir Bros Unit Constructions Pty Ltd v RTA [2006] NSWCA 314 Morris v Danoz Directions Pty Ltd (in Liq) (No 2) [2010] FCA 836 at [13] Peter Croke Holdings Pty Ltd and Anors v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW [1998] 101 at LGERA at [38] Yates Property Group Pty Ltd (in Liq) v Darling Harbour Authority [1991] NSWLR 156 at 186 Texts Cited: The Principles and Practice of Valuation Dr J F N Murray (P 62, 3rd edition 1954) Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Charles Parfett (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate