NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Yousif v R [2014] NSWCCA 180 Hearing dates: 06/08/2014 Decision date: 12 September 2014 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adamson J at [39] Bellew J at [40] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - offence or robbery in company contrary to s97(1) Crimes Act 1900 - co-offenders charged with same offence - different sentences imposed - whether unjustified disparity in sentences - significant difference in subjective cases of offenders - disparity in sentences justified by differences between co-offenders. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 - s97(1) Cases Cited: Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 463 Jimmy v R [2010] NSWCCA 60; 77 NSWLR 540 Kelso v R [2010] NSWCCA 34 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Jones (unreported, NSWCCA, 30 June 1994) Wong v R [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ali Yousif - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: D O'Neil - Applicant C Everson - Respondent Crown Solicitors: SE O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2012/70671 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-08-26 00:00:00 Before: Craigie DCJ File Number(s): 2012/70671
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate