NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: North Sydney Council v Bewley [2014] NSWLEC 145 Hearing dates: 14 August 2014 Decision date: 14 August 2014 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Preston CJ Decision: (1) Grants leave to the applicant to discontinue the proceedings pursuant to r 12.1 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005. (2) Orders each party to pay their own costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - civil enforcement proceedings - applicant sought leave to discontinue - leave required as respondent did not consent to discontinuance - respondent did not oppose grant of leave - leave granted - notice of discontinuance filed
COSTS - discontinuance of proceedings - civil enforcement proceedings to enforce local government order to demolish retaining wall and remove tree - discontinuing applicant sought order that respondent pay costs of proceedings - respondent sought order that applicant pay costs of proceedings - default order under civil procedure rules that discontinuing applicant pay costs - whether Court should order otherwise - onus on discontinuing applicant - whether respondent's conduct prior to or during proceedings unreasonable - respondent's conduct prior to proceedings not so unreasonable as to justify costs order - respondent did not surrender or capitulate - supervening event made prosecution of proceedings futile - proper exercise of discretion to make no order for costs - whether Council should receive order for costs from date of offer to discontinue - respondent did not act unreasonably in not accepting offer - appropriate to order otherwise than default order - each party to pay own costs Legislation Cited: Local Government Act 1993 ss 124, 628(2) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Pt 12 r 12.1 Cases Cited: Ralph Lauren 57 Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2014] NSWCA 107; (2014) 199 LGERA 424 Category: Principal judgment Parties: North Sydney Council (Applicant) Mrs Roslyn Bewley (Respondent) Representation: Mr A M Pickles (Barrister) (Applicant) Ms A Pearman (Barrister) (Respondent) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Applicant) Winston Readford Solicitors (Respondent) File Number(s): 40947 of 2013 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate