NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lacey v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2014] NSWCATAD 138 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 15 September 2014 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Scahill, Senior Member Decision: Decision of Respondent is affirmed. Catchwords: Breach of storage requirements; not in public interest. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2006 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aubrey v Commissioner of Police [2005] NSWADT 266 Bevan v Commissioner of Police [2004] NSWADT 1 Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9. Cusumano v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWADT 50 Drake v Minister of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1970) 2 ALD 60 at 77 Lynch v Commissioner of Police (GD) [2006] NSWADTAP 43 O'Donnell v Commissioner of Police [2009] NSWADT 82 O'Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210 Vella v Commissioner of Police [2003] NSWADT 91 Ward v Commissioner of Police [2000] NSWADT 28. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Peter Lacey (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) File Number(s): 1410003
reasons for decision
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate