NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Goldsmith v Bisset [2014] NSWSC 1272 Hearing dates: 09/09/2014 Decision date: 18 September 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) The questions set out in Annexure A are those to be submitted to the joint conclave of road accident reconstruction experts, namely, Mr William Keramides, and Mr Warwick Kiernan. (2) Notice of Motion filed 1 September 2014 otherwise dismissed. (3) Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of the Notice of Motion. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - interlocutory issues - directions - preparation for hearing - orders made for conclave of experts - attempts made by plaintiff to draft questions to put to experts - defendants refused to agree on questions - Practice Note No. SC Gen 11 -requires that parties should agree on the questions to be answered - failure of defendants to comply with Practice Note and Court orders - questions to be put to experts Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Evidence Act 1995 Interpretation Act 1987 Cases Cited: Campton v Centennial Newstan Pty Ltd [No.2] [2014] NSWSC 177 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Charmayne Goldsmith by her tutor, the NSW Trustee & Guardian (P) Luke Bisset (D) Representation: Counsel: J Maconachie QC (P) W Fitzsimmons (D) Solicitors: Carroll & O'Dea (P) Sparke Helmore (D) File Number(s): 2006/298059
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate