NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hines (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1273 Hearing dates: 3 July, 16 September 2014 Decision date: 17 September 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: Sentenced to a non-parole period of 16½ years commencing on 19 February 2013 and expiring on 18 August 2029 with a balance of term of 7½ years commencing on 19 August 2029 and expiring on 18 February 2037. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Sentence - murder - single stab wound to the chest - no premeditation - intention to inflict grievous bodily harm - provocation as a mitigating feature - previous offence of murder - future dangerousness - standard of proof - protection of the community - circumstances of deprivation - relevance of intoxication - victim's impact statement in cases of homicide - all human life precious - whether appropriate to take family victims' impact statements into account in determining sentence - recent amendments - "aspect of harm done to the community" - particular circumstances - special circumstances - aggravating features Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Aslett v R [2006] NSWCCA 360 Attorney General's Reference No 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; (2013) 249 CLR 571 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; (2010) 205 A Crim R 1 Fardon v Attorney General (Qld) [2004] HCA 46; (2004) 223 CLR 575 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; (2013) 249 CLR 600 Olbrich v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 270; (1999) 108 A Crim R 464 Potts v R [2012] NSWCCA 229; (2012) 227 A Crim R 217 R v Aytugrul [2009] NSWSC 275 R v Barlow [2013] NSWSC 217 R v Beldon [2012] NSWCCA 194 R v Bell (1985) 2 NSWLR 466; (1985) 18 A Crim R 19 R v Booth [2014] NSWCCA 156 R v Borg [2010] NSWSC 951 R v Dang [1999] NSWCCA 42 R v Gittany (No. 5) [2014] NSWSC 49 R v Hearne (2001) 124 A Crim R 451; [2001] NSWCCA 37 R v Heffernan [2005] NSWSC 739 R v Hines [2014] NSWSC 701 R v Anthony Jones [2012] NSWSC 1433 R v Loveridge [2014] NSWCCA 120 R v McNamara [2004] NSWCCA 42 R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76. R v SLD [2003] NSWCCA 310; (2003) 58 NSWLR 589; (2003) 142 A Crim R 503. Veen v The Queen (No. 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; (1988) 33 A Crim R 230 Versluys v R [2014] NSWCCA 98 Category: Sentence Parties: Crown Accused: Alan John Hines Representation: Counsel: P McGrath (Crown) E Wilson SC (Accused) Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Aboriginal Legal Service (Accused) File Number(s): 2013/52349 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate