NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Seller; R v McCarthy (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1290 Hearing dates: 28 July 2014 - 8 August 2014 Date of orders: 22 August 2014 Decision date: 19 September 2014 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: 1. Quincy Tang is prohibited from giving evidence in the trial in accordance with his three statements dated 3 November 2009 and his statement dated 30 June 2010. 2. Dismiss all of the other orders sought in the further amended notice of motion filed 5 August 2014 and the identical notice of motion filed by Mr Raphael. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – charge of conspiracy with intent to defraud or dishonestly influence the Commissioner of Taxation – prior compulsory examinations of accused by the Australian Crime Commission – transcripts of compulsory examinations and other compulsorily acquired materials provided to proposed witness for the prosecution – evidence of the witness founded to a degree on the compulsorily acquired materials - whether witness should be prohibited from giving evidence in a subsequent criminal trial
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for a permanent stay – whether prosecuting lawyers who had conferred with the witness should be prohibited from appearing in the trial – whether the trial should be permanently stayed as a result of the compulsory examinations Legislation Cited: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth), s 25A(9) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 29D and 86(2) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 135.4(7) Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW), s 13(9) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 50, 79 and 138 Cases Cited: Lee v NSW Crime Commission [2013] HCA 39; 87 ALJR Lee v The Queen [2014] HCA 20; 88 ALJR 656 [2012] NSWSC 934; (2012) 269 FLR 125 R v Seller; R v McCarthy [2013] NSWCCA 42; 273 FLR 155 Seller v The Queen; McCarthy v The Queen [2013] HCA Trans 204 (6 September 2013) TS v R [2014] NSWCCA 174 X7 v Australian Crime Commission [2013] HCA 29; 248 CLR 92 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Ross Edward Seller (Accused) Patrick David McCarthy (Accused) Representation: Counsel: DJ Fagan SC (Crown) P McGuire (Crown) P Strickland SC (McCarthy) P Bruckner (McCarthy) DKL Raphael (Seller)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate