NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Oakes v Oakes [2014] NSWSC 1312 Hearing dates: 22, 23 September & 1 October 2014 Decision date: 02 October 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Pembroke J Decision: See paragraph [50] Catchwords: SUCCESSION - family provision - claim by divorced former daughter-in-law of deceased - whether plaintiff an eligible person - relevant considerations STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION - meaning of 'member of household' - section 57(1)(e) Succession Act Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 Cases Cited: Churchill v Roach [2002] EWHC 3230; [2003] WTLR 779 Doshen v Pedisich [2013] NSWSC 1507 Hammond v JP Morgan Australia [2012] NSWCA 295 Legione v Hately [1983] HCA 11; (1983) 152 CLR 406 Morris v Morris (1982) 1 NSWLR 61 Petrohilos v Hunter (1991) 25 NSWLR 343 Thompson v MacDonald [2013] VSC 150 Thompson v Public Trustee of New South Wales [2010] NSWSC 1137 Wilcox v Wilcox [2012] NSWSC 1138 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Narelle Oakes - plaintiff James Edward Prosser-Fenn and Wayne Francis Oakes - first defendants Wayne Francis Oakes - second defendant Representation: Counsel: M M Pringle - for the plaintiff B Ralston - for the first and second defendants Solicitors: Bale Boshev Lawyers - for the plaintiff Baldock Stacy & Niven - for the first and second defendants File Number(s): 2012/396119
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate