NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Allen v R [2014] NSWCCA 193 Hearing dates: 2 September 2014 Decision date: 25 September 2014 Before: Beazley P at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Garling J at [34] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - knowingly take part in supply of commercial quantity of prohibited drug - no error in characterising offender as above "mere" courier - focus should be on actual activity - sentence not unreasonable or plainly unjust - sentence does not offend parity principle Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Cases Cited: Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCA 49; 244 CLR 462 Makarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242; 219 A Crim R 104 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Charles Allen (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Miller (Applicant) Ms S Dowlling (Crown) Solicitors: William Whitby Lawyers Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2013/87363 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2013-12-13 00:00:00 Before: Frearson SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/87363
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate